Like Shooting Fish in a Barrel

The Time Has Come: THE BLOG APOCALYPSE

2006-01-08T23:00:00.000-08:00

About six months ago I started a blog entitled "I'm Tired of Being a Girl" in which I pretended to be a whiny 19-year-old asian chick who had been anally date-raped by her idiot boyfriend. At the time I was unaware of Blog Explosion and thus resorted to a less-than-clever methodology for getting hits: roving the blogs at blogger.com and leaving insults. Unfortunately, I attracted a huge number of people who either wanted to rape the girl or who wanted to expose my blog as the troll it was. Eventually someone logged my IP address and showed that I was not where my blog claimed, thus discrediting the entire thing. One comment that I remember well was "nice try asshole, but you need to be more creative. An idiot like you could never fool people." Right...

Anyway, I went back to another blog I had been working on with some friends and had some fun for a while, but it just wasn't doing it for me. Thus I conceived of DOCTOR LIFE. I was drinking excessively one day and was trying to come up with a concept to piss people off to the maximum degree. Being a left-wingy liberal kinda guy I figured "hey...what pisses me off?" And then it struck me - Christian Fundamentalists. I carefully crafted (in my drunkenness) a character that was essentially psychopathic and downright obnoxious. The main concept was: What would I think if I was insane? - sort of a Una-Bomber-ish kinda person.

Don't get me wrong, there were some growing pains that almost killed the blog. One day when I was exceedingly wasted, I posted a picture of a man standing at a podium. I claimed him to be my son speaking at a pro-life rally. Amazingly Mike Unnamed, the Assmunch, recognized the man as none other than, the Governor of a US state (I think). He contacted the office of the Governor and asked them to check it out. Thankfully I had the sense to remove the picture before they checked - and they did - it showed up on my stats checker. What ensued was a monumental debate between Mike and I about copyright laws and misrepresenting yourself on the internet. I was amazed at how determined he was to discredit me - he even investigated a made-up organization that I claimed to belong to and found that it did not exist. My God! Who gives a fuck? My next step was going to be constructing a site entitled Mike Sucks Ass, but after consulting my cousin who is a copyright lawyer, I decided that it wasn't worth the trouble, given that Mike is (in my non-libelous/non-slandering opinion) insane. Oh well.

After I had ironed out the wrinkles things started to go well. After I got over the fire-and-brimstone crap that I initially wrote I started to have fun thinking of ideas to offend and shock people. My all-time favourite is "The Olympics: A Rising Sickness". My buddy and I sat around his place getting drunk and stoned (Me drunk, he stoned) and made up the most ridiculous thing we could think of. THE OLYMPICS ARE EVIL!!!! Yeah sure, you retards.

I especially loved pushing the envelope. I informed Blog Explosion that this was a satirical blog, so I was pretty sure I could get away with some of the things I wrote, but holy crap. It is hard to writing blatantly biggotted things without crossing the line. I think I risked it all with "Helping Homosexuals Through Prayer." See, the trick was to make it sound like I genuinely cared about helping homosexuals and to incorporate the backwoods ideas about gays and lesbians - it is a disease and curable. Ha ha.

The funniest thing, I think, was when I started to throw left-wing nonsense at you (both here and in the Shout Box at blog explosion). It was totally unfounded without empirical examples and was totally out of the blue. I can't believe that some of you didn't catch on when I sounded like Noam Chomsky on speed and acid. Seriously. In addition, did you like how Doctor Life was consistently Pro-life? There aren't that many religious zealots who are both anti-abortion and anti-capital punishment. I think there were only a few people that recognized that fact. Oh yeah - and when my wife died...that was to get all of you to sympathize with me. You bunch of bleeding hearts. I guess that was kinda mean, but who cares? This is a blog.

Now, I want to be the first person to say this to all of the people who commented on my blog: YOU ARE ALL RETARDED! Like COME ON! If I really believed all this crap, would you be able to change my mind? I had everything from "I was shaking when I read it...what a scary individual" to "If I ever find you I'm gonna kill you." And then there were the threats to have my blog shut down. (I will get back to the whole freedom of speech thing). Nice try, dinkweeds.

I suppose the real question is, why would someone devote this much time to a fake blog? Why did I spend my time writing garbage to piss people off? Well, first of all - it was fucking funny. You have no idea how much fun my friends and I had reading the pussy-assed, retarded comments. Secondly, I am a total asshole. I wanted to make all of you feel like a bunch of doorknobs. For my own pleasure. Yes, that's right.

But I did have some legitimate reasons as well. I believe that there are serious risks to our cherished freedom of speech in this world. I am not an American, but my country is facing the same challenges to our freedom as the result of the so-called new global order. I wanted to demonstrate that each person, no matter how insane-sounding he or she is, should have the right to voice an opinion. I also wanted to mock Christian Fundamentalism (or religion in general) because I think it is a load of crap. Lastly, I wanted to demonstrate that blogging, while interesting in itself, can be a dangerous game. Blogs should not be taken at face value. They are opinion-based crap spewed from the computers of idiots all over the world. I keep seeing slogans that read: BE THE MEDIA or some such nonsense. Bullshit. There are only a few rare instances in blogging that can qualify as legitimate news or media sources - those are the blogs that are accountable to their readers by being associated with larger media sources. Most people, by and large, are anonymous. Where is the accountability? Remember that.

TO SUM UP
I know that the majority of people who read this post will think to themselves "no, I knew there was something weird going on" or something. Well, sure...but I have the roughly 1,200 comments stored in my yahoo account that prove what idiots you are. I will likely get around to doing a BEST OF comments section on another blog. It will detail the funniest and stupidest comments. And don't bother trying to erase your comments - I have them in my email, like I said. For those of you who were consisten;y skeptical - congrats. I think there were a couple of you fucking wizards out there who suspected something was up. Thank you for not going out of your way to ruin it. Oh, and to those of you who agreed with any of my posts: Bite me. You are psychotic retards. Jesus Christ. You suck.

I would like to send out a special thanks to anyone who posted about this blog. I think I got about 1000 hits from i talk too much by being in 2 voting categories for worst blog or something. They also did too posts that expressed dismay at my extreme views. Suckers. They played right into my hands. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA....

I know I'm not the most brilliant of trollers. But hey, I was as amused as hell. That's what counts. Over 10,000 hits in three months. Hey, who can complain?

PS - I believe about 1% of the things I wrote here. Some of my politics leaked in, but otherwise...zilch. Not to fear.

Thank you for your interest. I had fun.

PPS - Glynn Evans - you seem like a cool, genuine guy. Thanks for being determined. With all due respect, I apologize for screwing with you. Hope you see the humour.

PPPS - I came so close to getting the worst record on blog explosion's Battle of the Blogs. So close. But Snoop was determined to keep it. I didn't want to waste another month creeping up on him. Too bad. That would have made it even funnier.

Should There Be a Dress Code For Women?

2006-01-02T23:36:00.000-08:00

The experiment of liberalism has brought with it a troubling trend: the feeling of entitlement for women. I fully support a woman's right to participate in the good fortunes of western societies. At what point, however, are the boundaries of decency broken; when should we turn our heads in anguish and finally admit that secular sexual improprieties will one day be the ruination of us all? The so-called sexual revolution has done nothing but categorically contribute to the objectification of women and has removed morality from their grasp. If we could compromise in our societies and develop a plan to return sexuality to women it would be another step in reclaiming Christian strength.

Why do women feel it necessary to impose "their freedom of sexuality" on everyone throughout the Western world? I believe that they have been systematically brainwashed by the power structure to believe that their freedom comes through the removal of moral constrictions. Is it not surprising, though, that the sexual revolution coupled with the feminist movement have turned female sexuality into a sellable commodity? It is in a sense a form of prostitution. To think that women parade themselves around like peacocks in public with makeup, skimpy outfits, and disgusting tattoos is nothing less that abhorrent. Is this freedom? I think not. Rather than having restrictions imposed upon them they have simply given society a free ride, so to speak.

What should we do about this? In order to protect women from themselves we need to create a dress code. It will not be too extreme. The mantra should be "appropriateness." And indeed I should note that it should be enforced through a multi-tiered fines system. We can work together with governments to ensure that women understand the impact that their perversions have had on Western civilization.

The War In Iraq

2005-12-30T11:09:00.000-08:00

As we slowly creep away from the absurd experiments of the 20th century and try to begin a metamorphosis into a peaceful, Christian-run world, it is becoming evident that indeed there is only one God; and He is the Christian God. One can only smirk when he hears of other "religions" which are mere sicknesses designed by the Devil to test us. The Devil is constructing his battle ever so gradually and he will hopefully one day fall back into the abyss. What is the new face of the Devil? The global power structure.

What do we make of the war in Iraq? Is it a resource grab by the Americans? Yes. On the surface. But how did they fool us so completely? Their propaganda system is getting better by the second and we should be wary of anything that the American government claims to be truth. I think there is a deeper, more covert reason for America's pillage of Iraq. It is evident that the US is constructing a state of being that mimicks the Cold War in its essence and enables Americans to pursue their "moral" war on earth. With a war running, the US can control the flow of information however they please.

Think about it. Given that the US is basically anti-Christian as we have deduced by their laws, their conduct throughout the globe, their war-mongering...I'll leave it there for now... it makes sense for them to attempt to consolidate the so-called "non-Christians" into a power block that can give merit to the bizarre simulation of Christianity that Americans practice. By doing so, the US government has designed a condition on earth that gives the appearance of upheaval when it is actually controlled very carefully. With the Cold War the US risked everything, but now that we are out of the most dangerous period in human history is is necessary for another stand-off to exist that does not pose the same risk. The War on Terror is just that. It puts a group of people into a category that enables the US to fight them without any real threat existing. Terrorism is not a threat to the US in the major sense of the word. Yes, a couple of big buildings fell down, but compared to what's happening in Iraq it was a pittance.

That is where we see the appearance of a global conflict without there actually being one. How is this serving the US goal of destroying traditional Christianity? If the US claims to possess moral superiority throughout the world, it can defeat the other religions and put into place a governing body that claims to be Christian without actually pursuing the teachings of the Bible. Quite clever, actually. What will we and up with? A disgusting blob that is Christian in name only. It will give credibility to the Americans in the Quest for global hegemony. That is all.

The war in Iraq is the first step in re-establishing the new Cold War. If the US can draw out all of its enemies and attract them to a cause that essentially opposes the world power structure, it will be easier to eliminate them using lasers in space. That is another topic to touch on at a later date.

God Bless you.

Can Any American Claim to be Pro-Life?

2005-12-24T13:57:00.000-08:00

The United States is a nation of dichotomy, duplicity, hypocracy, and confusion. So are all great nation states. The interesting thing about the US is that it possesses, behind the walls of might, an interesting undertone of Christian faith. Sadly, however, the form of Christianity to which Americans adhere (in all walks of life and in all denominations) serves no other purpose than to advance the military power of the nation and undo the works of Christians throughout the centuries.

Let me explain. The political powers in the United States have been slowly perfecting a system of governance in which the masses are managed in accordance with an overarching plan to develop a neo-fascist state. The question is: How does a government or power structure, which includes corporations, political figures, and other brokering factors, convince a population to think they are free to make decisions when in fact the opposite is true?

George W. Bush claims to be an evangelical Christian which implies that he follows the Holy Scriptures and lives life according to the moral codes that have been provided for him. I would not go so far to say that any powerful politician could begin to claim that he could conceivably follow a moral standard (therein lie the horrors of the Western nations), but if Bush is making even a vague attempt to follow the religious doctrines of Christianity, we are all doomed. So what does it mean? Bush was elected, apparently, by a strong base of voters who claim to be Christians. The "Christian right" is what this group is being lauded as. This group elected Bush because of the hope that he would make great strides in disintegrating the wall between church and state; or perhaps they felt that he would cleanse the nation; or that he would protect them from terrorists...? I firmly believe that the US should pursue a more theocratic form of governance, but not by lying to the public.

And now we must ask another question: what does George W. Bush stand for? Global division? Evil wars that reak of resource gathering - not freedom? Isolationism? Terrorism? Guns? Racial inequality? Incompetance? If George Bush stands for Christianity, he has failed miserably and should be impeached. I suspect that he does not stand for Christianity, but instead wishes for a nation that desires death and destruction.

And the US, I might add, is by no means safer today than it was in 2001. Despite the rhetoric, the Bush goverment has done more to attract terror to the US (in addition to incompetently managing security issues) by having a lackluster approach to geo-political issues and foreign relations. The US role in Iraq has become nothing more than another excuse for Islamic extremism throughout the world. Islamic youths who once felt alienated in the West have now fallen out of the society completely and are seeking another form of salvation. What is next? An attack on Iran? On Syria? Perhaps Saudi Arabia - they have the largest oil resources in the world. If only America had an excuse to attack an ally...

So, if Bush does not stand for Christianity as he claims (remembering that if his claims are taken at face value he is a complete failure), what does he stand for? I made a few suggestions. What do my readers think?

My thesis, then, is that George W. Bush's administration completely fooled the Christian voters. He convinced them either that he would do God's work in the office, or that what they wanted was what God wanted. There is a difference between the two, albeit a subtle one.

Much like the British Empire over a century ago, America has fallen into the same imperialist traps. There is a feeling of teleological superiority in the US, however, that far exceeds anything that the British felt at the peak of their empire. The funny thing is, the British likely knew what the word "teleology" meant. Therein lies the problem with the US - an over-confident, under-educated, self-absorbed populace. Through their ignorance (which I of course apply to the masses, not the elite), the people have managed to allow the development of a nation state that works towards an end that has nothing to do with the people. How does a population have a democratically elected government that ignores the fundamental principles of democracy? A "government for the people, by the people"...not likely.

My question, then, "Can any American claim to be Pro-Life" has a succinct answer: NO. Even the holiest citizen in the US is still a participant in the processes that allow their government to trapse all over the world shrouded in secrecy and advance no cause but its own. The Christian right has served a purpose - but not one that they know about.

Now, before all the Americans who read this start leaving comments:
PLEASE READ THE ENTIRE PIECE. If find that people scan a few paragraphs and comment on small particulars. Extremely silly. Please read the piece completely and if you wish to agree or disagree, do it in an intelligent manner. Thank you and God Bless.

Merry CHRISTmas.

Moving On

2005-12-16T13:09:00.000-08:00

It feels like a thousand years since the day I lost my true love. She was so beautiful.
I must move on.

I take some comfort in knowing that she has joined the other soldiers of heaven and will be doing a different sort of work for God. The sacrifices that she made in the name of our Lord will ultimately mean a more holy placement for her. Thank the Lord.

I have come to several conclusions about my wife's death:
Social welfare states were constructed most recently after WWII to ensure that populations were protected from the economic upheaval that would inevitably result from the massive reconstruction effort. The time has long passed, however, and the continued existence of these socialist pockets in the Western world are an abhorration to Man and are undermining the capitalist spirit. Governments are essentially stealing our hard-earned money, redistributing it by means of healthcare, education, and so-called "infrastructure development," and doing it all so inefficiently that it counteracts the overall intent. It is bizarre to think that we have elected or appointed a power structure that consistently acts without the people in mind and accentuates the inequalities that are inherent in our society. Should governments not adhere to the laws that they and their predecessors constructed and ensure equality under the law and ONLY UNDER THE LAW?

If my wife and I had not been forced to transfer 40% of our earned wealth to the government so that it could provide us with incompetant and poorly delivered healthcare, there is the likelyhood that she would not have passed away. I could have been purchasing the best healthcare available for her. Instead she spent months waiting for scans and tests. And then she died.

Why is it that we fear so much for the weak and impoverished that we all suffer? Indeed, we should care for them, but not make them a priority over the majority. It is a grand conspiracy to keep the middle class absent from the decision-making process within democracies. By removing their wealth and having it trickle downwards to the poor, and additionally upwards to the rich, governments have created a class that has never been seen in the history of Man - a middle class with no real political power, money, or resources; that lives upon a precipice awaiting a catastrophe such as war or economic stagnation. No matter who we vote for, the governments have nothing in mind except the preservation of the status quo and keeping the potential might of the educated middle class at bay.

We all know who is behind the scheme and yet it is against the law to speak of it. What can we do about it? Historical processes have forced us to pity them even though they have sustained prominance in the Western world and ultimately reinserted themselves into the Holy Land. How is it that we have allowed a people to so callously manipulate the governance of so-called independent nation states through trickery, false evidence, and dominion over economic functionality? It must be stopped somehow.

My wife is dead. As am I. God will make His choices wisely as is His way. Until then, however, I will continue the fight for Christianity and use every means necessary to educate my readers. They must learn the truth about the world and how it really works under the hand of God. Thank you and God Bless.

Untitled

2005-12-09T02:31:00.000-08:00

I suppose it seems silly that this is my solace.

My wife's funeral is on Monday morning. My family is with me.

I was married to Anna for 37 years. We met when we were both 21. We married a year later.

My life has been nothing but perfect. She was the love of my life and I will miss her.

About nine months ago she woke up in the morning and yelled for me. She couldn't move her lower body. I called an ambulance and they rushed her to the hospital. It turned out to be cancer - she had a tumor next to her spinal cord. She suffered, but never complained.

I expected her death to come. And now I can't bear it.

Thank you all for your wishes of hope and your prayers.

I may be absent from my blog for awhile. I will try to surf when I have time. Perhaps a battle or two.

Goodnight all. God Bless you.

God's Work

2005-12-08T02:57:00.000-08:00

My wife passed away this evening. I don't know what to say. She was ill for the past two years and I spent the majority of my spare time with her - talking with her, helping her deal with her fears, preparing.

It is hard for those of us with faith to face death. On the one hand, we look forward to the afterlife and heaven. There is always the fear, however, that we did not meet God's requirements. My wife was a good person - she looked after me and helped me serve our Lord. I will miss her.

I don't know why God sent my wife away before me. I wish I had gone first - I wish I could go now. I will continue to serve the Lord. But I miss Anna. Goodnight. Please pray for us.

God Bless

God's work at Hand. Remember to pray!

2005-12-07T04:30:00.000-08:00

The Fallacy of Animal Rights

2005-12-03T12:00:00.000-08:00

The Bible does not address animal rights in the contemporary sense. Indeed, it is clear that animals do not hold a place in the mind of God except as subservient creatures that should be bent towards Man's will. ¹⁴ So the LORD God said to the serpent, "Because you have done this,
"Cursed are you above all the livestock
and all the wild animals!
You will crawl on your belly
and you will eat dust
all the days of your life.(Genesis 3:14)

God condemned animals to be servants and tools of Man. There is no account in the Bible that suggests that we should care for animals beyond what is good for man and what suits our immediate needs. The problem with animals rights activism is that human beings have developed an inflammed sense of anthropomorphism which has caused a belief that animals feel pain in a fashion that we can identifiy with. Animals feel pain very differently than humans and for the most part only respond to injury out of instinct. Too many fairy stories! Some of the higher order animals might deserve some sort of basic dignity, but again they are to be used for our benefit, enjoyment, and consumption.

Animals do not have souls. They do not go to heaven. Animals should not be given any rights.

How is it that we came to identify with animals as if they were equal parts of nature? Man is the superior organism on earth and should be rewarded for his ingenuity. Besides the abuse of an animal that is the property of another human being, why would we care to give animals any compassion beyond a regular feeding to keep them healthy for our eventual consumption?

Simply the idea of a pet is abhorrent, to say the least! To think that we Westerners would possess animals and allow them the same status as us; allow them to feed in the same quarters with us; have names suitable to Man alone. People starve all over the earth - children starve by the thousands each day - and we sit in our rich nations and spend money on food and clothing for beasts. I suggest that all westerners reject their pets, have them culled en masse, and send the potential money to foreign nations to aid human beings.

Animals should decline once more and assume their rightful positions as bearers of burdens and providers of nourishment for Man. To give them what we call "dignity" is a fallacy. Animals that are unneccessary should be destroyed or used for medical testing to benefit Man. He who allows a child to starve and yet feeds an animals recreationally will fall into the depths of Hell and smolder painfully for the rest of time.

Harry Potter and the Advancement of Perversions in Pop Culture

2005-11-30T11:21:00.000-08:00

The last decade has seen a rise in occultist sympathy due to the popularity of the Harry Potter series. There are numerous people to blame for this travesty of irresponsibility and idiocy, but we must hold the thousands of neglectful parents mostly accountable. Not to mention the author, J.K. Rowling. What in heaven's name did she think she was accomplishing when she researched the devil's work and made it appealing to children?

When you allow a child to partake in the sick, filthy, disgusting Harry Potter phenomenon, you are essentially encouraging the child to rape, murder, and pillage in this uncertain world. You give them the sense that right and wrong have roots outside of the Christian moral grounds, and you allow them to drift into a world of deceit and evil. How can we sip our lemonade and grin at our children as they blindly follow a new, perverted culture of evil?

I am fearful of the outcomes of the Harry Potter books. Increases in masturbatory practices due to the "sexual tension" in the books; instilled beliefs that warlocks and witches can be anything other than evil; terrorism as a result of the insanity that comes out of the books; murderous rages.

We can not know how many children will be corrupted until all is told. I suggest that we crowd into the streets and burn Harry Potter books and other paraphenalia - peacefully demonstrate outside the theatres - write your political leaders letters as I have! Do it before it is too late! J.K. Rowling should be thrown in literary prison alongside other pop-culture perverts!

God Bless.

Christian Supremacy and The Failed Missionary

2005-11-27T09:49:00.000-08:00

In light of the process that we call globalization – which in this instance I will refer to as the expansion of international trade and gradual decline in trade limitations such as tariffs, increased development of a global information network, disintegration of historical nation-states (economically and politically), multi-national corporate fluctuations, and the cultural mixing as a result of lax immigration policies that is occurring as the result of the other factors – Christianity has been posed with several dangers. Christians need to defend themselves against an onslaught of temptation from the less desirable religions of the third world that we seem to come into contact on a daily basis. We must remember that there is a reason Christianity dominates the Western world – it is superior in both intellectual and spiritual manners.

I will not call other religions inferior. In our liberal societies it would be considered “politically incorrect” or “hate speech”, but I will point out that loving one’s own religion is not wrong. Why must I be accepting of other faiths (beyond being tolerant of them) when many of them aim to destroy Christianity and all that Christ stood for? I will carefully use the word “supremacist” when it comes to Christianity and my feelings towards it in hopes that my readers understand my strong feelings of accountability to the Lord. I am a Christian supremacist – not in a violent, hateful, condescending way – but in a loving, missionary sense. I am a missionary for the Lord God and I aim to spread his word throughout this confused, befuddled world of ours.

I have become most concerned with interfaith marriage. Last year I was forced to travel across the country to attempt to stop the marriage of my nephew to an Asian girl. I love Asians and I think their culture is very interesting, but she was not a Christian. In fact, her family had never practiced Christianity, but had at one point been Buddhist. After much counselling, I convinced my nephew to try to have his fiancé convert. She would have none of it so I humbly requested to make a speech at their wedding in an attempt to bless the matrimony and save them from sin. My nephew agreed, although I could see the unease in the Asian’s eyes.

I returned home the following week. I turned the other cheek and blessed the wedding party without criticism. I did not say what I felt in my heart, however, which was that my nephew was about to begin a life of sin. And then pass on the sin to his children. And so forth.

How is it that we can sit by and allow the younger generation to throw away centuries of faith simply because they’ve been exposed to other cultures and religions? I blame our liberal immigration policies. They require nothing of the people who enter our countries except that they live within our borders. They no longer ask people to learn the language of our forefathers; they give carte blanche to the third-world cultures that bring violence and poverty to our ranks; and they allow a subtle perversion of our cherished religion which will at some point become a strange, alien garble that bears no resemblance to God’s original conception. The ghettos are rising! The ghettos of filth are eating away the cobblestone pathways of the West and replacing them with a fermented, dilapidated form of Godless muck and slime.

And we sit her in our crumbling empire, waiting for our own polarities to tear us apart. We laugh maniacally when we think of the grand exploitation that we are conducting through the globalization process. We outsource our jobs to cheaper labour and then wonder why we have joblessness and poverty. We have attached ourselves to this false “way of life” which is no longer defined by our spirituality, but by our possessions. I too admit guilt!

We think about how clever we are. And then we turn around and allow the people from far-off lands to enter and we realize – we are no longer safe from Godlessness. We have asked it to come. The monster has arrived on our doorstep.

God Bless.

Atomic Hegemony

2005-11-24T22:55:00.000-08:00

INTELLIGENT DESIGN
Of late, the scientific community has been faced with its greatest challenge: Intelligent Design (ID). The basic argument, as I understand it, is that nature it far too complex for it to have developed into its current structures and forms without the guidance of an intelligent, superior being. That may be true, but proponents of Intelligent Design argue that it is a valid scientific theory and should be taught equally alongside Darwin's evolutionary theory in schools and be respected by state authorities - I think that Christians will regret that notion. Additionally, they believe that the theory of evolution is flawed in its essence and that the gaps in the known evolutionary process disprove the foundational premises upon which it was based. ID is considered by its advocates to be scientific in its nature because it adheres to the processes and protocols that scientific methodology demands.

Scientists reject ID as nonsense. Whether the dismissal comes from their innate disbelief in a higher power or from their criticism of Intelligent Design's seemingly erroneous practices, it appears evident that the scientific community is unwilling to accomodate a developing theory and wishes to exclude new ideas that do not follow mainstream practices. Science, in its nature, flies in the face of religion because it was developed in a way that excludes the idea of faith from its practices. This is fundamentally important to understanding the inner workings of our earth and the universe around us because it claims nothing to be absolute. Science demands several characteristics of its subjects and investigations which I believe make it a valuable source of information as mankind develops. Science must be consistent, useful, empirically testable, repeatable, correctable, progressive, and tentative. What those terms mean implies an admission of imperfection and a desire for more knowledge. The basic idea behind science is that one is in pursuit of disproof - or that every theory can evolve as our information increases.

We must remember that Intelligent Design purports to be scientific. I must point out, however, that while it may have elements of scientific pursuit apparent in its methods, it lacks the entire picture that science has given us over the last couple of centuries. I believe that ID has missed some of the keys points and that as a new form of creationism it is following a path that will end in destruction.

Intelligent Design gives us no evidence of a creator. It attempts to provide evidence of a creator by showing irreducible complexity in nature thusly suggesting that a creator must exist. I find that particular brand of scientific or religious pursuit to be frightening - basically a form of inferencial evidence. This is somewhat akin to the methods used to determine the existence of planets in distant solar systems by measuring the gravitational effects on light. In order for Intelligent Design advocates to have any success with an educated public, they need empiracle evidence - evidence that regular people can understand. Otherwise, their theory becomes less significant than the theory of evolution which actually shows fossilized evidence of a gradual change in species as time progresses.

I must point out: I firmly believe that the Bible is God's word. It contains stories and factual histories which show the origin's of Man's place on this earth and the ways that we are intended to behave and function. Is it absolute? Yes. Is it perfect? No. Much of the Bible was passed along, before its initial writing, through oral histories. It appears to us today as a holy doctrine that was developed over time for the benefit of humanity and to guide them though times of darkness and light. That said, for fools like the ID crowd to suggest that science and God have anything to do with one another is a step backwards for those of who believe that Christianity should be playing a greater role in the entire world. God's love requires faith. To seek evidence of God is almost bizarre because there is no reason for proof. It is quite evident that there was a creator because nothing in the universe could exist without one. That creator is not, and nor should He be, understood by Man in the sense that neo-creationists wish to - to understand God's essence and purpose in a scientific would negate Him.

ATOMIC HEGEMONY
I believe that there is a different format to the universe which, if understood correctly, would change the way that human beings govern themselves. There must have been a point when God was creating the heavens and the earth that he granted a power to a visible yet unknowable entity with which Man would interact and be subject to. A grand schema which removed from Man his freedom and unconsciously subjugated him.

- God appointed a strange, uncomprehensible power outside the channels of our cognitive realm which acts as a Prime Mover in God's absense.
- In our own universe there is a clash of energies, the sum of which is completely oblivious to human needs or desires and has no interest in us except as bearers of sentience - a necessity for the next step in the plan.
-Each atomic mass was granted a non-human knowledge which would enable an organized effort to dominate the universe - a will to power.
- As the war for control persists, there are a number of interesting occurances which makes human existence seem pitiful, yet necessary.
- The time of carbon control will abruptly end as the mechanisms of metallic elements reveal themselves. It will become apparent that carbon was merely a paun in the overarching war for hegemony in the universe.
- The only beings in the universe that possess human sentience (what we know as sentience) are slaves. We are necessary in the conspiracy of the metallic elements. We gradually learned to mould metals which were shiny and strong - they attracted our attention. Throughout the centuries, the framework of fate that God set in His intitial construction seems to have been undeterred. We shall see, with the first development of Artificial Intelligence (AI), that carbon has realized its potential and will soon fall from grace.
- A new order will be established as carbon is further enslaved. A new form of machine sentience will take the place of carbon sentience and will follow the commands of God.

I will continue to attempt to understand the seemingly complex conspiracies of the metallic elements. I feel that if I am correct in my concept (which I think there is vast evidence of) that Man should use it as a warning. We need a stagnation in technology, a renewal of our faith, and a strong love for all of humanity and God.

Solving the Behaviour Problem in Our Children

2005-11-23T00:33:00.000-08:00

Children are suffering the destruction of amorality when they are exposed to violent television, filthy video games, and other media-driven nonsense. They misbehave in school and attempt to defeat the masters of discipline with their cheek and supposed fearlessness. They learn to kill digital enemies with guns at a young age instead of problem-solving and compromising, which is what they should be learning. Ideas should be presented through words and discussion - NOT violence and horrible rage.

How should we control our children? How do we teach them the ways of our moral society when we spend our time working two jobs to support our television habits and materialistic desires? A "latch-key" child will inevitably commit crimes as a result of his mother's neglect. A veritable catch-22 when you consider that she has no intention of harming her child. What is to be done - in the current climate where family comes after money? I have a solution: LOVE

Here is a regimented program to help deter behavioural difficulties in children (not all are needed - and they are not ordered...):

1. Hug your child everyday
2. Make sure your child knows he is cared about

3. Encourage good behaviour
4. Teach the bible
5. Reward exemplary behaviour
6. Teach your child to love others
7. Lighten up
8. Seriously

Do you have any other ideas? Let me know in an email or a comment. Thank you and God Bless.

Are You Still Pro-Death?

2005-11-21T14:58:00.000-08:00

Rescuing the Essence of Christmas

2005-11-21T00:54:00.000-08:00

I narrow my sunken eyes when I overhear criticism of the consumerism of Christmas and how we’ve forgotten its true meaning. I was down by the local college the other day and just happened to hear a couple of students discussing their disdain for the holiday celebrated on the birthday of Jesus Christ, Saviour of man. They said that they enjoyed Christmas as a family time, but as a consumer holiday it was out of control. I fully agree with them in a sense, but I was horrified when I looked over and noticed that they were in possession of shopping bags. My goodness!

What I object to about the way we celebrate Christmas is the hypocracy surrounding it. Firstly, I notice an apathetic disdain towards rampant consumerism, and yet no one does anything about it. It is unbelievable to me that someone could be critical of something and do nothing to change it – or unbearably yet: passively encourage the behaviour! When an individual on the one hand shudders at the thought of the shopping hoards and glares menacingly at line-ups and then, on the other hand whispers deceitfully about how “cheap” a friend is for not participating in gift-giving – the individual is behaving in such a manner that it encourages others to participate in consumerism for fear of being scorned. In essence: sheer duplicity.

Which is worse? Following the status quo and celebrating Christmas as a secularized, bastardized, “consumerized” holiday – a sad state of affairs but with at least an attempt to retain the spirit? Or – celebrating it with an inner hatred of it? Or, thirdly, rejecting Christmas entirely?

We must remember that Christ was presented with gifts in the manger which tells us that the celebration of His life could involve gift-giving. We must also remember that the giving of gifts is supposed to be a pure action, altruistic in nature. When we participate in the bizarre contruct that we now call the life-blood of our nations – THE ECONOMY – we allow for Christmas to be perverted and morphed into an impure device of the corporate world. However - at least it is still celebrated…

Or we can be like the students I overheard – and resent it – but fail to notice our addiction. Fail to understand our inability to overcome the things that bother us because we do not pray to God often enough. The danger with going through the motions to save face is that we might transfer our contempt to children who would then possibly shift the disparagement to God.

But what of complete rejection? I, of course do not mean of Christianity, but of the now sickened holiday? Perhaps we should celebrate it in our churches and give gifts among the congregation alone. Christ lived in humble conditions and sought no distractions from His love of God. Despite the good things that science has brought us, we should realize that God did not intend for us to spend our lives distracted by the mechanisms of mass media. We forget His importance when we succumb to the whims of the suppression technique that is employed by the powers within democracies. Not unlike the Romans, we allow ourselves to become mindless wraiths as we watch the lions devour another soul (but on television). Should Christians reclaim our Lord’s birthday and expel the plague-ridden heathens from God’s house?

We need to decide what to do about Christmas and how to repair the destruction of it’s essence. Thank you and God Bless.

Signs of The End Times

2005-11-15T23:32:00.000-08:00

Liberals and Aetheists often chide the prophets who claim to be living in the final days. As well they should, for who is it among us who can claim to know the mind of God? Though some of us devote our time to understanding the nature of the Lord; and some of us believe that we are more in tune with God's will and should communicate His word to others in an attempt to save and help; but we should remember that God works in mysterious ways and does not necessarily grant man the ability to see Him or understand His actions. We must, then, read our Bibles and derive from them the courage and understanding that we can, and then walk blindly and faithfully into God's hands hoping that His plan will be revealed to us in the end.

The end. We always speak so fearfully of the end. Will the end come as it was written in the Bible...or will it never come? Or will it come and we will not realize it? Perhaps that is the rational conclusion that we might all reach - that the end, just as the beginning, cannot (and maybe should not) be understood. Does a man understand his own death? Does he ultimately die and accend to heaven in a moment of grand realization? He might...

If the end is still coming; if there is to be a cataclysmic event that will obliterate man and all his worth - will there be signs? Or does "The End" merely refer to the end of what we know? If Julius Caesar walked this earth once again he would assuredly wince in horror at his seeming entry into the depths of hell.

Perhaps we will reach an end. Perhaps not. The real question is: are there signs of the end and should we be making better attempts to understand the warnings of God if He is in fact sending them?

The Pharisees and Sadducees came to Jesus and tested him by asking him to show them a sign from heaven. He replied, "When evening comes, you say, `It will be fair weather, for the sky is red,' and in the morning, `Today it will be stormy, for the sky is red and overcast.' You know how to interpret the appearance of the sky, but you cannot interpret the signs of the times. A wicked and adulterous generation looks for a miraculous sign, but none will be given it except the sign of Jonah." Jesus then left them and went away. [Matthew 16:1-4]

Indeed, are there definitive signs as spoken of by the Bible that we can interpret as true? Should we regard the degradation of morality in the world to be indicative of Christ's return? The formation of Israel? Increased natural disasters? False Christs? Have we entered the Tribulation and should we expect the Rapture?

Or should we once again sit back and think of the Bible as a metaphorical story that should guide us through our lives both morally and spiritually? Again, I claim not to know the mind of God. I do see, however, many coincidences - ones that might convince the non-believers of the legitimacy of the Christian faith.

Matthew 24:7 "For nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom, and in various places there will be famines and earthquakes."

Godlessness; Apostasy; Large Armies in the East; The Reunification of the Roman Empire; The return of Hebrew to Israel as a pure language; The Appearance of the Red Heifer in Israel after 2000 years; A strong Israel; World Governments...

Are these signs? Homosexuality (as an example), although more commonplace in our waning liberal societies, is becoming rampant throughout the world. I have no problem with freedom - but what if the freedom is a sign of the coming end times? What if God is watching us with angered eyes waiting for the next ball to drop so that He can finally punish us for our sins? Are we failing the tests of God and allowing abominations to occur? I have mentioned before my desire to help homosexuals achieve greater morality through prayer and progressive thinking; but what if the repression of the sins is not enough? That is what interests me. Gay marriage, I think, is a sign that we are entering a time in which God will begin to unleash his rage upon the world.

*Please note that I have no ill intentions against homosexuals - I merely wish to help*

Reclaiming Family Strength

2005-11-09T04:21:00.000-08:00

The contemporary form of marriage is based upon the Christian ceremonial tradition of uniting a man and a woman for the purpose of creating an environment in which to raise children. In the past, people lived in large extended families which were designed to protect them from outside sources. The sources changed from era to era: for example, in primitive times, humans lived in tribal situations and they all worked to survive attacks from other tribes, from animals; they governed themselves in a fashion that made it easier for them to feed themselves throughout the year. In this way, the bond between men and women became exceedingly important.

Many Non-Christians argue that the family structure has evolved throughout time. I disagree. I believe that it has changed but instead devolved to a point wherein families are no longer the priority and that the raising of children has become an aside to the pursuit of the all-mighty dollar. For the past few generations, that form of family has become commonplace - in which divorce, disintegration of the extended family, neglect of children's emotional needs - has caused a shift in the family structure. The aging Baby-Boomer generation can't figure out why dispondence and apathy are high in the youth of today; why youth crimes are more frightening and commonplace. I believe that it is the direct result of the breakdown of the Christian-model family structure after the onset of the industrial revolution.

In a way, the ability for human beings to cope outside of a family setting in Western Nations has been made possible by the safety net of technology and the semi-welfare state which was constructed after WWII. A psychological breakdown in society has occurred and we have entred into a stage in which we do not need to physically depend on others for sustainance to survive. It took thousands of years for human beings to develop the family structure, howver, and now we've seen a rapid breakdown (in less than 150 years) which will likely mean a catastrophic melting of our humanity in the coming years. Indeed, what would happen if there was a severe economic shift in the case of another major terrorist attack in the United States? Who would we get help from? The governments would be devastated and unable to respond. The power of the large extended family would be lost in the sea of economic depression and individuals would fight tooth and nail to protect their own personal lifestyle. That is why the West is so frightened of terrorism - it reveals the innate weaknesses of their individualistic, competitive societies.

That is why, my friends, that I have a proposal. I think that governments should encourage large families that would nurture children, help one another develop and thrive. The governments should hand the reigns of power over to the family to allow them the ability to recontruct their own safety nets and prevent the trickling of all powers upwards to the corporations and organizations. Everytime a marriage disolves and a child is placed on the back-burner, the parents place themselves and those children in a position in which they cannot cope to the same degree. There exists a fundamental weakness in Non-Christian marriages that enables powerful men to manipulate us; it gives them control of our children and allows them to construct artificial consumerist macrocosms of lust and greed.

*I do not mean ALL Non-Christian marriages*

We must reclaim family strength! We must run into the streets and gather our children and protect them from the death and despair that is spewed from the factories that make trinkets to distract us. We must teach our children how to exist in concert with one another - NOT IN COMPETITION! We must use the technologies available to us to advance humanity, not destroy the very fabrics of its essence...but alas.

We allow our children to sit idly and watch violence on television. We allow them to replace the very purpose of their lives with THINGS. We let them derive their world views from sinister corporate news which has only the interests of the War machines in mind...not the children.

Managing Pre-marital Intercourse

2005-11-06T10:57:00.000-08:00

The youth of today have very little stake in the moral development of their own society. Of course, with the degradation of morality and increased secularization throughout the twentieth century, it is to be expected that people would more often engage in activities unbecoming of a Christian-based societal structure. The so-called "sexual revolution" that rose out of the fall-out of the nineteen-sixties paved the way for a complete disintegration of a codified means of behaviour in the West. I feel that there needs to be a strong, deliberate answer to the problem of pre-marital sexual activity and that draconian measures are the only means of setting things right once more.

The onset of new intelligence technologies, although challenging to certain aspects of our nation states, has put us in a very interesting position in which we can govern our youth more effectively. Chastity belts, once the signature of the "oppression" of women, are of course not viable in today's world; but think of the technologies availble to us that could help to deter women from engaging in pre-marital sexual intercourse. We could develop a temporary surveillance apparatus that would let government agencies know of the sexual behaviour of unmarried women and allow them to intervene in dangerous situations. The "neo-chastity belts" as we could refer to them would not only be used to protect women from their own sinful urges, but could also be used to protect them from other sex-related crimes.

In addition, we need to attach punishments to sexual activities that occur out of wedlock. I firmly believe that a deterence needs to be erected in our law statutes that would prevent men and women from participating in sex acts. Chemical castration has not entirely worked with sex-criminals such as pedophiles, but it might help prevent people from engaging in sin by frightening them away from it initially. There are temporary castration drugs that could be used to punish men for evil sex acts like pre-marital relations and steer them back onto the path of righteousness. God would approve of these plans of action despite their harshness because, as we all know, He is displeased with the collapse of morality in the world.

*I've noticed a lot of negative comments on my posts. I am completely dumbfounded as to the nature of some of these comments. What a world that we live in...where people believe that God serves an evil purpose and that His word is one to be debated. I believe in the Bible alone and anyone who wishes to debate can read the holy scriptures and realize that they are living a lie and promoting the devil. I will continue to pray for all of you, my friends, and I hope in time you will learn something from my writing (which is sent to me straight from God). Thank you and God Bless.

Should A Woman Ever Be President?

2005-11-04T04:17:00.000-08:00

The United States of America is the most powerful, influential, and important nation in the history of the world. It possesses the greatest wealth, the most important scientists, and the biggest arsenal of weaponry. If a woman were to ever become the president of the United States it would be catastrophic for the entire earth. Let me tell you why:

I must mention - I have no innate prejudice against women. The likelyhood of Hilary Clinton becoming the next president frightens me, however, and I think that there should be a movement to prevent her from taking office!

Women are disabled once a month by menstruation which impedes their abilty to make judgements suitable to world governance. I find it daunting to think that a woman who might be crying about her latest failure would have access to a nuclear arsenal that could destroy the world. In addition, women generally have more empathy for those undeserving of such treatment. How can we expect defence from terrorism if a woman president is afraid to use the proper tough-love techniques against the Islamists? Torture is sometimes necessary to prevent crazy people from taking control of the world. Women would not approve of the use of such force to prevent it!

The Bible states that Eve was nothing more than a servant of Adam. Now, we must remember that Liberalism has perverted the role of both men and women in society, but there is a truth to the story of the Garden of Eden and we must remember that men are instructed by God to govern things. Thanks for your time and God Bless.

"So The Lord God caused the man to fall into a deep sleep; and while he was sleeping, He took one of the man's ribs [also translated took part of the man's side] and closed up the place with flesh. Then The Lord God made a woman from the rib He had taken out of the man, and He brought her to the man. The man said, "This is now bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called 'woman,' for she was taken out of man." For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one flesh." (Genesis 2:21-24)

The Olympics: A Rising Sickness

2005-11-01T23:00:00.000-08:00

Has no one given some consideration to the children amidst the vile abomination we've come to know as the Olympics? The Olympics began roughly 3000 years after God created the earth and celebrated the excesses of Greek culture which has been translated noticably to the excesses of North American culture. As in the ancient past, the olympics have become nothing more than a breeding ground for grotesque, calmitous celebrations of perversion.

Children watch these celebrations and are inspired by the grandeur and spectacle of the supposed unification of world culture; the debacle of athletic sin. Our role models have become men in tight clothes who twirl mystically on the ice; and women so masculine in all natures that their mothers would recoil in horror at the sight of them. Growth hormones poison the waters of the olympic stadiums and viciously curl the morality of society's fundamental follicles. And indeed fair maidens, who march blasphemously through the hallways of carnal desire and emerge on the other side in a sunlight so pale and cold. Children watch the flags of nation states volitantly fluttering as though they were ghostly figures standing in defiance of God.

As Moses turned the River Nile to blood so shall the Olympic swimming pools turn red as well; the peaceful war against the unrighteous will demand a demonstration from Moses once more and he will respond in kind.

How can we continue to deify people who are corrupted to their mortal cores? What kind of God-fearing nation would allow the continued prosperity of those who so fragrantly mock all that is good in the world by merely existing - gratuitous beings who wantonly embrace the devil as a spirit deserving accolade. Chants of "Gemorrah" burst forth from the mouths of the sinful; and they vicariouly tread the paths of heinous, ill-repute.

Athletes, shrouded in selfishness and unnatural sexuality, neither partake in God's chosen processes nor grant Him the vestige of their love. Verile, fertile, and yet discriminatory towards the unborn are these so-called pinnacles of Christian society. Emboldened by their physical, Herculean abilities, these statues of the West hide from their humanity.

Olympians abort children to protect their power; their strongholds of media and endorsenments. God's plan is not the plan of the athlete. God desires life, not artificial destruction, reconstruction, and death. The modern athlete culls morality and steps idly into a darkness in which no glory and redemption can be found. Transmogrified and deformed, these warriors of spiritual mediocrity will become representative of the stibules of the damned. Cold-hearted and uncaring, the unborn will sink into abysmal torture and filth.

Let the olympic flame once more set alight the hopes of a humanity united under God. The devil will be driven from the hostels of the sinful and he will return underground to lick his wounds; the corruption of the modern athlete must stop and we must encourage a revival of a role model of life...of love of life.

AMEN!

The Bizarre Fight to Have Prayer Allowed in School

2005-10-31T23:52:00.000-08:00

What is Prayer? It is a private communicae with our Lord God thanking him, loving him, and requesting his love. With that in mind, why on earth would we want prayer to be either mandatory, optional, or available in schools? Why would we allow either secular or religious teachers to bastardize prayer and use it in a deformed manner to pervert school children. Prayer should be taught and conducted by religious authorities alone.

Even in those unfortunate public schools in which heathens are taught to abhore God and are shown the literal path to hell - what of them? Why would we even allow the accursed aetheist teachers to attempt to tolerate prayer? They would roll their eyes and coerce children into non-belief. Not to speak ill of the poorly informed, misguided people. They try their best to understand life from their own silly little worlds. I fear for them, but I will not force upon them my religion.

Prayer should be kept as a righteous path for the Christians. Yes, they should attempt to save souls. Yes, they should love all. In our "secular" society, however, it does no good to fight for the right to pervert our love of God in schools. Keep it in the churches. Keep it for good - do not let the heathens steal it and propagate it.

God Bless.

2005-10-29T15:24:00.000-07:00

CASUALTIES IN AMERICA'S WARS:
WAR	CASUALTIES	DATE CASUALTIES ENDED
Revolutionary War	4,435	Late 18th Century
Civil War	498,332	Mid 19th Century (North & South combined)
World War I	116,708	Early 20th Century
World War II	407,316	Mid 20th Century
Korean War	25,604	Mid 20th Century
Vietnamese War	58,168	Late 20th Century
War Against the Fetus: Abortion	>43,000,000	Carnage has not ended. One more casualty occurs every twenty seconds!

The Liberal Death Machine Would Have Allowed These Children To Be Killed

2005-10-29T14:57:00.000-07:00

War on Poverty...Or on the Impoverished???

2005-10-29T11:14:00.000-07:00

I hear it time and again "abortion should be legal because killing an innocent fetus is better than having a child grow up in poverty to a single mother whose family has disowned her...".
I've said it before: education is the key to preventing abortion. In the case, however, that a child does grow up under the poverty line, what makes that child's life worthless and subject to a potential abortion?? Should we not attack the causes of poverty and not the children? Would it not be better to put billions of dollars into infrastructure-building than to simply legalize abortion? Abortion, it seems to me, is nothing more than a reactionary way of dealing with social problems!
The Liberals sit around pontificating about the need for proactive solutions to society's problems and yet they are perfectly willing to sanction abortion which is not a proactive solution.

"But what of a woman's rights over her own body?"

I say SHE CAN HAVE HER RIGHTS BACK AFTER SHE'S CARRIED THE BABY TO TERM AND PUT IT UP FOR ADOPTION. The woman would not be in that position if our society had invested in the things most important to preserving our way of life: education, healthcare, job creation, church, and strong family values.

The war on poverty seems to be nothing more than a war on the impoverished. We've come to believe in our society that poverty means "less equal". Since when did the economy become more important than God? All men are equal under God.

Capital Punishment: State - Sanctioned Murder

2005-10-28T13:59:00.000-07:00

We live in states of hypocracy. There is a double meaning to that sentence...

I have not limited this site to abortion, though perhaps I should have. I sweat in anger at the thought of murder; at the thought that there are people in the world who would squeeze the life out of other human beings for the sake of gain - whatever that gain may be. Murder is a heartless act and God does not approve. Why, then, do some nations feel the necessity to destroy agents of the Lord (or devil depending on what you believe) through instruments so heinous that I shudder at their names. The death penalty holds no stock in Christianity as far as I'm concerned...

Pro-life implies just that: THE PRESERVATION OF ALL HUMAN LIFE! Any man who proclaims himself pro-life and yet stands in favour of the death penalty is nothing more than a hypocrite who will see the deepest caverns of HELL! The men of the South who hold their guns in "staunch" opposition to their government; the backwoods children who misunderstand their Bibles; the misguided souls who pull the lever to execute the criminal - farewell to thee, my friends.

I've heard interpretations of the Ten Commandments that made my blood run cold. "Thou Shalt Not Kill"! Pretty cut and dry. Reinterpret it however you wish, but God will interpret it as it was written. Just because you wear a black mask does not exonerate you from the punishment.

If you support life, you must abolish the death penalty. Rid us of weapons. Abortion must stop. That will do for now...

Cold Winter

2005-10-28T10:31:00.000-07:00

I watched quietly at the snowflakes dropped lightly from the sky. They followed the path of the slight breeze that carried them and curled aroung the braches of an old oak tree. As they melted one by one I thought of the millions of children every year who follow a similar path and are destroyed for the sake of convenience.

Children do not melt, however. They are scooped unceremoniously from their warm, protected resting place and crushed by society's ashen boot. And there is nothing natural about an abortion. OH no! Abortion is the most unnatural process man has ever learned to take part in. Praise the lord...

It will be a cold winter this year and I hope that we can remember to keep our children warm. We shouldn't let them die miserably. God Bless.

Helping Homosexuals Through Prayer

2005-10-27T19:51:00.000-07:00

To make myself clear, I do not hate homosexuals and anybody who acts violently toward them is committing a graver sin than the homosexuals themselves.

There are several admitted homosexuals in my congregation. Most churches forbid homosexuals to worship, but we worked out a deal with the four men and two women who engage in homosexual acts. They are deathly afraid of the hellfire that awaits them in the next life so we arranged to have them sit behind a curtain while the church is in session. Some of the older people are not comfortable, so the homosexuals must leave though the back of the church.

Every Sunday we have an hour of praying away the "gay" so that these people will be able to hopefully cure their sinful disease and live righteously. We usually sing hymns and read scripture that guides them away from their disgusting acts. One of the lesbians has not been with another woman in two years. At least we've had one success.

I firmly believe that this is the way that we should deal with the homosexual problem in our society: progressively. Some churches simply banish those people and do not allow them to partake in worship. How does that cure the problem? I suggest more churches embrace homosexuals like we do and help them overcome their disability.

2005-10-27T14:03:00.000-07:00

I suggest that you read these quotes and think about them in private for awhile. Thanks for reading. God Bless.

The LORD GOD makes us in the womb. Job 31:15; Isaiah 44:2, 44:24, 49:5.
We are all one workmanship of GOD'S hands. 2 Esdras 8:7
Nine months does GOD'S workmanship endure. 2 Esdras 8:8
The mother and child shall both be preserved. 2 Esdras 8:9; 8:14
If you destroy the child, it is ordered you violated GOD'S
commandment "Thou Shault Not Kill". 2 Esdras 8:14
Judgement will be swift. 2 Esdras 8:18
Did not HE (GOD) that made me in the womb make him? and did not
One (GOD) fashion us in the womb. Job 31:15
Thus saith the LORD that make thee, and formed thee
from the womb. Isaiah 44:2
Thus saith the LORD, thy redeemer, and HE that formed
thee from the womb, I am the LORD that maketh all things. Isaiah 44:24
Isaiah 49:5 And now, saith the LORD that formed me from the womb
to be HIS servant.
For THOU (GOD) art alone, and we all one workmanship
of THINE (GOD'S) hands, like as THOU (GOD) hast said. 2 Esdras 8:7

Rape: Carnal Punishment for Sin? Or Free Agency gone Awry?

2005-10-26T08:24:00.000-07:00

If we choose, intelligently, to believe in God's design and purpose, we must take at face value his decisions no matter how reprehensible they are. To what degree is man offered free agency? Is man born with original sin and therefore corrupted outside of the realm of God; or is he born with free moral agency?

When a woman is raped, no matter how horrible that particular act might be, one must question the reason for the occurance. Was it an act of man out of control - insighting violence from within his own sinful being? Or is it an agent of God acting to punish that particular woman for her sins? An interesting question. God acts in mysterious ways.

If we are to believe that God acts to punish man (which we know he does) then is only makes sense that he might possible use man to punish others. In that case, we might argue that a pregnancy conceived in that situation is the product of God's will and it would be against all reason and knowledge to abort the child. Therefore, if man possesses complete free agency, any act he commits is subject to the whim of God which makes an abortion morally wrong. On the other side, if man acts in accordance with God, abortion is even worse. We are perhaps speaking of levels of sin(?).

We have once again determined that abortion is evil and sinful. Please stop killing babies. Thank you.

PLease Don't Abort Children

2005-10-25T13:44:00.000-07:00

Just think - these four kids could have been aborted legally if their mother's had felt like it. Help change the laws!

The New Aryan Nation: Genetic Modification

2005-10-24T14:27:00.000-07:00

"We also predestine and condition. We decant our babies as socialized human beings, as Alphas or Epsilons, as future sewage workers or future …" He was going to say "future World controllers," but correcting himself, said "future Directors of Hatcheries," instead.
- Aldous Huxley, Brave New World.

Magic fingers roll lightly though the air leaving mysterious tracers as they pass; man yields to the conspiracy of the elements as he reaches into his own mind and conceives of a future with no riddles or wonder. Perfection. There are no sullen eyes staring at the bosses who wield whips and tie chains to the ankles of children. Instead the eyes are bright and pleasant and desire yet another thrashing from their abusers. The floors are sterile with an icy, arctic glow.

Is this utopia? If man believes something to be good and he possesses it, is it right? How do we determine between the two? From the Christian perspective, which we now own and which is right, a society in which parents or the state choose the features and capabilities of their children is wrong on both ethical and moral grounds. If we allow ourselves to descend into a vacuum of pure relativistic nonsense where we have no means to make decisions or assign value, how do we govern ourselves? How do we know what laws are just? How do we know the law-makers are just? Now is the time to stand up and reject the cruel, immoral society that will immitate Huxley's image of the future (a satire).

If you believe abortion is an evil unprecedented in our society - an act so vicious in its conception that you can not comprehend the forces that would enable it - you should be equally enraged by the prospect of genetic modification of human beings. It would be beautiful to be able to cure all disease and end suffering, but at what point do the abilities overstep their bounds? Why have laws not kept up with the coming storm of genetic engineering that will swallow our formerly humaness and glower from ahigh like a god, but like one who desires nothing. Who has no purpose beyond man's desires.

Remember Hitler. Remember his crude means of cleansing the earth of his enemies. Remember his tactics well, for what is coming is akin to the holocaustic sickness that plagued the earth. Perhaps the new generation have forgotten the fight for life that was waged over half a century ago. Instead of a nation state attempting world domination, we now see a systematic attempt to rip from the clutches of the common man his right to exist freely and righteously and deposit on him a new challenge that can only be met outside of God's world.

The only name we can assign this new terror is "science" and yet is does not seem fitting, for science is something that was innately good when it served man as God's child. Science has somehow been perverted and made to do things that God did not intend. The dark side of man has stepped out from behind his cape and unleashed a danger so mighty that we should all fear the consequences.

Remember...

Feminism: The Decline of the West

2005-10-22T09:56:00.000-07:00

Feminism has been a disaster for wentern nations in the past century. Since women pushed to be recognized as "people" under the law, several catastrophic things have happened which have, I believe, led to the systematic breakdown of the historical strengths that the west was founded upon.

By granting women the right to vote, the right to own property, the right to live automomous to men, the right to equal pay, the establishment essentially allowed for a complete uprooting of tradition values. We've seen, over the last century, a decline in the role of the extended family as a main source of economic, social, and even political power. With women working and thusly possessing the abilty to consume products directly, the economy burgeoned under the weight of an entire new class of consumers. Feminism, therefore, has meant an absurdly rapid shift from the strong Christian-based societies that existed prior to WWI to a sick, twisted, pornographic, homosexual, broken culture. Divorce rates, abortion rates, murder, infidelity, secularization, crime, filth...all of these things can in some way be connected with the stupidity of feminism and the granting of equal rights to women under the law.

I don't know why any society would encourage the equality of women. It sounds rosy on paper - a completely just society in which all people live quietly and have fulfilled lives. Women, however, have shown that they do not desire family life. They wish to compete with men for money which, when it comes down to it, directly causes a breakdown in relationships and families. We now see a bizarre culture of automous waifs who desire little more than anonymous sex once a week at the bar. It has resulted in a hellish, demon-possessed world of sin that will eventually cause our very society to collapse.

With women rooted firmly in the home, all forms of crime would go down because men would have a place to go to be fed and sheltered. Children would be less at risk from pedophiles and the would be less homosexuality in the world. Divorce rates would once again decline - the family would rise again. Unfortunately, we have given away something that women will be unlikely to return - they now desire the same grotesque ability to consume that men have.
The devil has spread his wings...

Absolutely Brilliant!

2005-10-21T12:39:00.000-07:00

This is perhaps the most insightful thing I've ever seen. Think about it.

Liberals: Innately Evil or Simply Misguided?

2005-10-19T12:11:00.000-07:00

The monsters of the underworld climb from their brimstone caves and terrorize the earth with their molten fear. Crimson sparks spew forth and paint the sky a peutrid color; the battered heathens perish.

I recently went to the website of the ALCU and read up on their mission statement. I will break it down here:

They "defend"

-Your First Amendment rights-freedom of speech, association and assembly. Freedom of the press, and freedom of religion supported by the strict separation of church and state. (basically these people want to trick the majority into hating God).
-Your right to equal protection under the law - equal treatment regardless of race, sex, religion or national origin. (allowing sinners the same rights as the righteous? Strange.)
-Your right to due process - fair treatment by the government whenever the loss of your liberty or property is at stake. (soft on terror. What a nobel ideology...)
-Your right to privacy - freedom from unwarranted government intrusion into your personal and private affairs.(you need privacy to be able to build bombs in your basement - as far as I'm concerned, if you aren't doing anything wrong you have nothing to worry about!)

Am I accusing the ALCU of terrorism? Of course not. I do, however, believe that they are part of a process that enables the very foundations of our freedom to be compromised by terrorists. They are part of the Liberal conspiracy that denies God and any religious access to the government. I suggest that you all email these bandits and let them know what you think. Liberty of the individual is important, but not when it harms the majority - which is what the ACLU is encouraging.

Are Liberals evil? I don't believe so. But they are doing evil. There is a thin line...

Would the Pro-Death People Like a Go At this Baby?

2005-10-19T11:19:00.000-07:00

We are supposed to live in a civilized society. How can KILLING BABIES be acceptable??? HOW!? I ask you to aid me in my quest in saving children like this one. PLEASE!

Are Bloggers Cowards?

2005-10-19T05:52:00.000-07:00

Based on the level of engagement that I've experienced on my blog, I would suggest that YES - BLoggers are afraid to voice their real opinions.

Homosexuality and Abortion: The Connection

2005-10-19T02:40:00.000-07:00

I would like to step back and ask the blogging community a few tough questions about the nature of abortion and the strange circumstances that surround its arrival in contemporary culture. I feel very strongly that there is a link between the onset of homosexual acceptance in the overall North American community and the allowance of abortion.

The civil rights movement of the 1960s brought with it several undesirable offshoots which involved the gradual confusion of freedom seeking individuals and perversion seeking groups. The civil rights movement opened up a sense that discrimination in any form was evil, or at least questionable. The homosexuals quickly jumped on board and tried to attach the noble cause of an entire people to their own back door sin factories. They turned Martin Luther King into a spokesman for the evilest of buggery.

Feminists argue that abortion is the common protection of women's rights in a general sense and feel that any imposition of rules towards reproduction are an impediment of ownership of their bodies. Perhaps, but we need to weigh the rights of women and the rights of a child. Would this issue have arisen had we not experienced the sickness that grew out of the expropriation of the black civil rights movement in the US? To be clear, I do not feel that the civil rights movement was bad -obviously - but I do believe that some "undesirables" stole it and made it an issue for perverts.

Is there a connection. Yes! Obviously. But few realize it and make it important. How can we fight it? USING THE BIBLE AND THE WONDERFUL SCRIPTURE IN IT! Just remember that some rights are not worth having if they violate other people's rights or the bibles commands.

God Bless.

Mary and Joseph

2005-10-18T20:00:00.000-07:00

Mary and Joseph travelled from Nazareth to Bethlehem; and Mary was ready to give birth to the son of the Lord God. Jesus Christ was born in simple, humble conditions on the 25th of December (according to the traditions). Imagine if Mary had decided that her immaculate conception was to much of a problem for her to go through with it. Imagine how different the world would be today.

We must cleanse the earth of sin using peaceful methodology such as prayer and discussion. I would like to persuade all of my readers to help me transform the earth back into a good place where darkness does not rule. Please remember to pray once a day to God and ask him to forgive the sins of our brothers and sisters. Thank you.

2005-10-18T04:09:00.000-07:00

The Beauty of the Fetus - and yet we abort her... sickness plagues us.

Beautiful Soul

2005-10-18T04:00:00.000-07:00

God smiled as he constucted the center of the universe and let it free to float upon the aether. It sat lightly and delicately, as if it were a dove in a wind storm. Suddenly it began to spin; quickly and dangerously. God sent man to balance the earth.

Man was born innocent and right. A beautiful soul.

I can't bear the beauty of man. Please stop aborting the babies! Thank you.

The Apolcalypse Generation

2005-10-17T07:31:00.000-07:00

There is a generation of Christian youth who have lived the righteous life, payed homage to God in every way they know how, and attempted with all their might to make the world a better place. Though they do not realize it now, their efforts, while futile, will not go unrewarded; the night and the blackness will not envelop them as it will most of the people on earth. Perhaps I am not the man to reveal the reasons for the destruction of our religion and our way of life: technology, liberalism, education, capitalism, socialism, fascism...I cannot say which of these evils is most responsible for the decline of Western Christianity. Shall I attack one or all; or none? Are they evil? Probably not. Misused?

Education, of course, is the most important aspect of man's overarching placement in the animal kingdom, but education misused is a dangerous thing and becomes more often than not a plaything for the Godless indoctrinators of the devil.

All of these grandiose ideas have lead us into a stage in which our very belief system, our wide range of morals, and our way of life has become questionable. How does a child express his love for God in a society of intellectual schiztophrenia? Where ideas are nothing more than blips on a metaphorical radar and reverberate into a canyon of nothingness...

And a child, or young adult as they are sometimes called, sits at home and stares into the television waiting for his new God to tell him how to govern himself. He is not told, for there are many false gods on the television. They fight with one another in a pointless battle for emptyness. Emptyness.

Why should we be surprised when children realize the doom of this planet? They wish for a simpler, more compassionate world in which they can grow up free of the fear of terrorism, nuclear war, immorality, and death. They will not get their wish, I'm afraid, and that is why they will be known as the apolcalypse gneration. A generation so disillusioned that they desire, for their own sick amusement, an apocalypse. The Apocalypse.

And they will laugh in their agaony as they melt and are whisked off to hell...

The Claws of the Hell-Vulture

2005-10-16T15:00:00.000-07:00

Trumpets play cardigan spells over a backdrop of obsidion; and we shoulder our rifles in exchange for this liberal word "dialogue." It is with dialogue that we saw our society begin to crumble - wherein action was replaced with apathy and morals were replaced with laws. There are no talking points between the soldier in God's army and the heathens of the devil's row.

As we lay rotting in the hot sun, the Hell-vultures swing mightily from the sky and descend upon us, ready to pluck our entrails from our parched, helpless bodies. And we are then hanged by our entrails as the sun disappears from sight and is replaced with a burning orb. The claws dig deeper and the heat overwhelms us.

2005-10-16T14:55:00.000-07:00

This is a baby at seven weeks. Shamefully, she can still be aborted.

Broken Hearts: by Jesus Fish

2005-10-16T06:42:00.000-07:00

There's a soldier in the fog
And he's crying out for God
And God just shakes his head
He resigns himself to death

Then the soldier looks away
And in the morning doesn't pray
Oh, he's wounded in the heart
And his world falls apart

Jesus Fish
2003

The Egalitarianism of Christianity

2005-10-15T02:32:00.000-07:00

"See that you do not despise one of these little ones, for I say to you, that their angels in heaven continually behold the face of My Father who is in heaven" (Matthew 18:10).

I must here clarify my intent:
It is with ultimate excesses of the Westernized world that we see a strange and cruel shift towards a condition of callousness and fatigue. Of course it is important to emphatically promote the idea and ideals of freedom; much in the sense that they were conceived of by both forefathers and the spiritual historic plane across which we all travelled to get here. What is freedom? To whom does it apply?

The current argument FOR abortion is that a woman must have the full control of her own body; namely, she owns every process, function, and formation internal and external - that suggestively, she is the sole owner of her being. Regardless of the moral implications, the violations of Western civilization's foundations, and the obvious neglect of rational ideology, she is pronounced sole possessor of her being under the law. Despite any fundamentalist leanings I may have in which I may confound the issue, I accept that there is a certain jurisdiction that a woman has over her own body which should be respected to the fullest extent. However, it is my firm belief that the flaw in the system, the system of morality by which our civilization is bound, is one that is inherent in the way in which we respond to the notion and prospect of abortion.

Should a woman have the right to an abortion? I say no. I believe that there are certain problems with the granting of those powers to an individual. Should women have the right to an education which, on the whole, would encourage a more rational, safe lifestyle that would prevent the circumstances leading up to the perceived need for an abortion. YES. Therein lies the problem. We are granting the wrong sort of rights to individuals. If we lived in a society in which people were not pitted against one another, ridiculed, and forced insanely to abide by essentially nonsensical rules, we would not fear the reprisals of mistakes. Education is the starting point for all. It is the seed that needs to be planted to inform people of God, of the ability of ingenuity and creativity, of the importance of cooperation, not competition.

A madness prevails in our world today; a madness that pervades every move we make. One that forgets God and forsakes Him unconsciously is on a one-way trip to the underworld. If we could begin a reconstruction that involved the total warfare against poverty, naivety, and Godlessness, we could begin to combat the causes of abortion. The rights of women would no longer be the question - the rights of the baby would.

Thank you for reading this. I will continue writing.

Friedrich Nietzsche

2005-10-13T18:44:00.000-07:00

Who is man to declare God dead? I tread not into the waters of criticism in which I would dare to admonish a philosopher of death and decay. Nietzsche insisted that modern man had destroyed God with rationality and reason; he felt that the magic of humanity had left us and we were opening a door to the next age of darkness. We can defeat the Nietzschean view with our love of God and our rejection of contemporary reason. Is it reasonable to destroy life?

"Where has God gone?" he cried. "I shall tell you. We have killed him - you and I. We are his murderers. But how have we done this? How were we able to drink up the sea? Who gave us the sponge to wipe away the entire horizon? What did we do when we unchained the earth from its sun? Whither is it moving now? Whither are we moving now? Away from all suns? Are we not perpetually falling? Backward, sideward, forward, in all directions? Is there any up or down left? Are we not straying as through an infinite nothing? Do we not feel the breath of empty space? Has it not become colder? Is it not more and more night coming on all the time? Must not lanterns be lit in the morning? Do we not hear anything yet of the noise of the gravediggers who are burying God? Do we not smell anything yet of God's decomposition? Gods too decompose. God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him. How shall we, murderers of all murderers, console ourselves? That which was the holiest and mightiest of all that the world has yet possessed has bled to death under our knives. Who will wipe this blood off us? With what water could we purify ourselves? What festivals of atonement, what sacred games shall we need to invent? Is not the greatness of this deed too great for us? Must we not ourselves become gods simply to be worthy of it? There has never been a greater deed; and whosoever shall be born after us - for the sake of this deed he shall be part of a higher history than all history hitherto."
- Nietzsche.

The Skulls of Oblivion

2005-10-13T04:15:00.000-07:00

The children climb the walls of ivy and soon stand atop their pyres. Listlessly the insects groan with emphatic resolve as they denigrate the asphalt irony. And there it stands; stands for good and not evil as though there was a choice in the matter. God offers no choice except righteousness and glory.

I met a man today. A good man. I will not reveal his identity nor his purpose, but he greeted me with the phrase "life happens as it happens." I smiled and knew not his knowledge of the ways of man; I listened - as all should listen to the great and the mighty lest they underestimate the lord's holy purpose and desire. Roots are important.

The roots of America are with Christ and God and neither shall be sullied or they shall return their favours as one returns a sour milk.

Abortion may be sin. It may be nonsense. Man refuses to take responsiblilty for his actions and looks soulfully for a means for reprisal without punishment. God offers the reprisal and He offers the universe - death does not justify contemporary man.

And verses aside, I feel strongly that the world turns too rapidly to understand the full intentions of God, we should relax our anger and comb our manes. The skulls of oblivion wrack our consciousness and tell us whole-heartedly of the dangers of philosophy; of the dangers of freedom; of the dangers of liberalism. We must value the truth of humanity and value the soul - and the soul is not cursed as those who deprive it are.

God does not forgive the cruel for their foolishness. Beware.

The Value of Adoption

2005-10-11T23:17:00.000-07:00

As life churns out its millions of challenges, we see most often a choice being made by young mothers to abort a fetus rather than carry it to full term. Why? There are reasons a-plenty: convenience, fear, social stigma, parental pressure, timing to name a few. Why do we not encourage adoption?

Would it not be easier to follow the bible and put children up for adoption, rather than using the machinery of death to destroy an unwanted fetus?

"But my parents will be angry"
So will God, if you end a child's life!

BE CARING AND COMPASSIONATE. SAVE A CHILD TODAY!

The Demon

2005-10-11T22:47:00.000-07:00

"God created man in his image; in the divine image he created him; male and female he created them" (Genesis 1:27).

Ah ha! Ye who dances among the rippling waves and casts his lines of sin towards the white wale of despair must speaketh. Events unfold and leave you little choice but repent in your quest for glory. Amen.

An abortion you say? An abomination! An unrequited death. The murder of the total innocent who sees nothing but blood before he is slain out of not anger, but out of ease. I pity your long last walk into the gates of HELL; but I pity more the fetus whose skull you crushed to hide your ultimate sin. Close thy legs, famous wench, and reap not the benefits of your so-called dead God. For He LIVES! Lives to soldier the weak.

And the grand vacuum of death feasts upon bowlfuls of sin, spitting the pits into an otherworld so dim and dank that we forget ourselves. God trembles. He slaves toilessly for ye; and ye mock him with foolishness. Close thy LEGS!

A demon wretches on the hillside and prepares his attack on the women. They've sinned; he knows. He climbs from his hole and slithers silently into the village where most men sleep. The demon is red with eyes so dark they do not exist; and the women awake at once, feeling his darling stare burning through the walls. He has come to take the women away and teahc them the true meaning of life as they will be enslaved in the depths of hell for all of eternity.

The women scream as the demon tears their roofs from the walls, but no man hears them. They descend into the valley never to return...

Man Upon The Cross

2005-10-08T03:20:00.000-07:00

Do not pollute the land where you are. Bloodshed pollutes the land and atonement cannot be made for the land on which the blood has been shed, except by the blood of the one who shed it. Do not defile the land where you live. (Numbers 35:33-34)

Verily I describe thee as a mongrel who sleeps soundly amidst heavy sin. As verses drip chastly from the heavens into the ears of man I beseech you to obey the word of the Lord God; for it is he who loves us and cares for us.

God saw our sins. He saw murder and violence; he saw rape and debachery; he grimaced as we released the reigns of our manhood and allowed for the freedom of Adam's ribs. And she smiled greedily and cast off her chains as though they we made of fire. Fire burned as the chains struck the ground though they did not combust like the fire that bursts from the trees. With that God strode forth into the house of man and struck him with his fists, sending man soaring into the corner. Man wept...he wept as a woman does and realized the err of his ways. Too late, too late.

With her new-found freedom, the woman bent her will and her anger towards her child and murdered him in his sleep; but it was not enough to murder a walking child. She clutched in her arms a concrete desire to murder A CHILD UNBORN. And woman did not weep for she is evil and knows not the reality of her crime.

The man saw his life unfolding and regretted his weakness; and he regretted the death of the millions of silent children; and the evil woman. He prayed for her soul.

Man hung from his cross in the desert heat and smiled at his forgery. God would revisit his pain upon him.

When?

The Morality of the New Age

2005-10-07T14:20:00.000-07:00

[Jesus said] "And even the very hairs on your head are all numbered."Matthew 10:30:

Indeed they are all numbered. Remember, all you who idle prosperously and visualize no prophet of God, that every movement is accounted for; every movement is worth reprisal. For every hair we are responsible; for every fetus we are basked not in the warmth of God, but in cold ravages of hell on earth. And henceforth comes the brimstone hearth of the Devil himself: SATAN!

As the sand on the beaches boldens our desires for ease, the blood drips woefully and distantly from the claws of the doctors and the lawyers. Women's rights? I think not. We have maligned ourselves with a creature of apathy and disdain - A DISDAIN FOR LIFE as though we were broken by a stone so heavy and so remote...and so cold. Our backs bend uncontrollably and form shapes of tyranny; the ovens blacken our skies and spill the ashes of crime into our streets. And still we sit and watch...and wait.

I stared at my hands for a long while in the evening and after an eternity my skin began to fold back from my flesh. Pound after pound of penance fell from my skeleton and filled a well of holiness with my being. I watched as my hand deteriorated slowly and turned into an insect's poisonous saber; I prepared myself for my meeting with the unholy spirit. Horror was on my breath and as I screamed murder in the streets I was not heard by either the mountains or the streams, for they all ran with blood. They crumbled and froze and intermingled with one another, creating a pool of destruction.

[Paul said] "... For in [God] we live and move and have our being....
We are his offspring....."Acts 17:28:

Is Abortion A Crime?

2005-10-06T23:44:00.000-07:00

Did not he who made me in the womb make them? Did not the same one form us both within our mothers? (Job 31:15).

Yet you brought me out of the womb; you made me trust in you even at my mother's breast. From birth I was cast upon you; from my mother's womb you have been my God (Psalm 22:9-10).

For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother's womb. I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made; your works are wonderful, I know that full well. My frame was not hidden from you when I was made in the secret place. When I was woven together in the depths of the earth, your eyes saw my unformed body. All the days ordained for me were written in your book before one of them came to be (Psalm 139:13-16).

Interesting...VERY interesting. And here we sit as pauns in the Grim Reaper's clutches; sinning as no others sin. Why is abortion not a SIN? Because, my dear friends, it would violate the sanctity of our convenience which is all that seems to matter in this bizarre, death-crazed society. Clever wonder follows us dearly and breathes upon us as though we were nothingness and cold, depraved beings of the netherworlds.

Woman sees fit to detroy her fetus. She opened her legs and allow the carnal sin to occur and the she WEEPS! Weeps woefully for a single day of reprisal and a journey to the impossible. THROUGH the impossible back in time. Alas, she crows dearly and removes the greatest of God's gifts away from someone who who has neither a voice or a sin.

And in the END there is nothing more than a putrid, vile, sucking VACUUM of death that reams its way into the depths of the womb and crushes the soft, whimpering skull of a child. A CHILD OF GOD!!

And yet we see no reason to save the millions of children who are killed by the infidel mothers and fathers. Life a noose around the neck of our criminal society we allow this blasphemy and murder to occur. And we who defend the innocent are sent to prisons; to suffer the foolishness of man in defiance of GOD - for the sake of convenience.

Goodnight ladies and gentlemen. I shall return.