The Time Has Come: THE BLOG APOCALYPSE

About six months ago I started a blog entitled "I'm Tired of Being a Girl" in which I pretended to be a whiny 19-year-old asian chick who had been anally date-raped by her idiot boyfriend. At the time I was unaware of Blog Explosion and thus resorted to a less-than-clever methodology for getting hits: roving the blogs at blogger.com and leaving insults. Unfortunately, I attracted a huge number of people who either wanted to rape the girl or who wanted to expose my blog as the troll it was. Eventually someone logged my IP address and showed that I was not where my blog claimed, thus discrediting the entire thing. One comment that I remember well was "nice try asshole, but you need to be more creative. An idiot like you could never fool people." Right...

Anyway, I went back to another blog I had been working on with some friends and had some fun for a while, but it just wasn't doing it for me. Thus I conceived of DOCTOR LIFE. I was drinking excessively one day and was trying to come up with a concept to piss people off to the maximum degree. Being a left-wingy liberal kinda guy I figured "hey...what pisses me off?" And then it struck me - Christian Fundamentalists. I carefully crafted (in my drunkenness) a character that was essentially psychopathic and downright obnoxious. The main concept was: What would I think if I was insane? - sort of a Una-Bomber-ish kinda person.

Don't get me wrong, there were some growing pains that almost killed the blog. One day when I was exceedingly wasted, I posted a picture of a man standing at a podium. I claimed him to be my son speaking at a pro-life rally. Amazingly Mike Unnamed, the Assmunch, recognized the man as none other than, the Governor of a US state (I think). He contacted the office of the Governor and asked them to check it out. Thankfully I had the sense to remove the picture before they checked - and they did - it showed up on my stats checker. What ensued was a monumental debate between Mike and I about copyright laws and misrepresenting yourself on the internet. I was amazed at how determined he was to discredit me - he even investigated a made-up organization that I claimed to belong to and found that it did not exist. My God! Who gives a fuck? My next step was going to be constructing a site entitled Mike Sucks Ass, but after consulting my cousin who is a copyright lawyer, I decided that it wasn't worth the trouble, given that Mike is (in my non-libelous/non-slandering opinion) insane. Oh well.

After I had ironed out the wrinkles things started to go well. After I got over the fire-and-brimstone crap that I initially wrote I started to have fun thinking of ideas to offend and shock people. My all-time favourite is "The Olympics: A Rising Sickness". My buddy and I sat around his place getting drunk and stoned (Me drunk, he stoned) and made up the most ridiculous thing we could think of. THE OLYMPICS ARE EVIL!!!! Yeah sure, you retards.

I especially loved pushing the envelope. I informed Blog Explosion that this was a satirical blog, so I was pretty sure I could get away with some of the things I wrote, but holy crap. It is hard to writing blatantly biggotted things without crossing the line. I think I risked it all with "Helping Homosexuals Through Prayer." See, the trick was to make it sound like I genuinely cared about helping homosexuals and to incorporate the backwoods ideas about gays and lesbians - it is a disease and curable. Ha ha.

The funniest thing, I think, was when I started to throw left-wing nonsense at you (both here and in the Shout Box at blog explosion). It was totally unfounded without empirical examples and was totally out of the blue. I can't believe that some of you didn't catch on when I sounded like Noam Chomsky on speed and acid. Seriously. In addition, did you like how Doctor Life was consistently Pro-life? There aren't that many religious zealots who are both anti-abortion and anti-capital punishment. I think there were only a few people that recognized that fact. Oh yeah - and when my wife died...that was to get all of you to sympathize with me. You bunch of bleeding hearts. I guess that was kinda mean, but who cares? This is a blog.

Now, I want to be the first person to say this to all of the people who commented on my blog: YOU ARE ALL RETARDED! Like COME ON! If I really believed all this crap, would you be able to change my mind? I had everything from "I was shaking when I read it...what a scary individual" to "If I ever find you I'm gonna kill you." And then there were the threats to have my blog shut down. (I will get back to the whole freedom of speech thing). Nice try, dinkweeds.

I suppose the real question is, why would someone devote this much time to a fake blog? Why did I spend my time writing garbage to piss people off? Well, first of all - it was fucking funny. You have no idea how much fun my friends and I had reading the pussy-assed, retarded comments. Secondly, I am a total asshole. I wanted to make all of you feel like a bunch of doorknobs. For my own pleasure. Yes, that's right.

But I did have some legitimate reasons as well. I believe that there are serious risks to our cherished freedom of speech in this world. I am not an American, but my country is facing the same challenges to our freedom as the result of the so-called new global order. I wanted to demonstrate that each person, no matter how insane-sounding he or she is, should have the right to voice an opinion. I also wanted to mock Christian Fundamentalism (or religion in general) because I think it is a load of crap. Lastly, I wanted to demonstrate that blogging, while interesting in itself, can be a dangerous game. Blogs should not be taken at face value. They are opinion-based crap spewed from the computers of idiots all over the world. I keep seeing slogans that read: BE THE MEDIA or some such nonsense. Bullshit. There are only a few rare instances in blogging that can qualify as legitimate news or media sources - those are the blogs that are accountable to their readers by being associated with larger media sources. Most people, by and large, are anonymous. Where is the accountability? Remember that.

TO SUM UP
I know that the majority of people who read this post will think to themselves "no, I knew there was something weird going on" or something. Well, sure...but I have the roughly 1,200 comments stored in my yahoo account that prove what idiots you are. I will likely get around to doing a BEST OF comments section on another blog. It will detail the funniest and stupidest comments. And don't bother trying to erase your comments - I have them in my email, like I said. For those of you who were consisten;y skeptical - congrats. I think there were a couple of you fucking wizards out there who suspected something was up. Thank you for not going out of your way to ruin it. Oh, and to those of you who agreed with any of my posts: Bite me. You are psychotic retards. Jesus Christ. You suck.

I would like to send out a special thanks to anyone who posted about this blog. I think I got about 1000 hits from i talk too much by being in 2 voting categories for worst blog or something. They also did too posts that expressed dismay at my extreme views. Suckers. They played right into my hands. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA....

I know I'm not the most brilliant of trollers. But hey, I was as amused as hell. That's what counts. Over 10,000 hits in three months. Hey, who can complain?

PS - I believe about 1% of the things I wrote here. Some of my politics leaked in, but otherwise...zilch. Not to fear.

Thank you for your interest. I had fun.

PPS - Glynn Evans - you seem like a cool, genuine guy. Thanks for being determined. With all due respect, I apologize for screwing with you. Hope you see the humour.

PPPS - I came so close to getting the worst record on blog explosion's Battle of the Blogs. So close. But Snoop was determined to keep it. I didn't want to waste another month creeping up on him. Too bad. That would have made it even funnier.

Should There Be a Dress Code For Women?

The experiment of liberalism has brought with it a troubling trend: the feeling of entitlement for women. I fully support a woman's right to participate in the good fortunes of western societies. At what point, however, are the boundaries of decency broken; when should we turn our heads in anguish and finally admit that secular sexual improprieties will one day be the ruination of us all? The so-called sexual revolution has done nothing but categorically contribute to the objectification of women and has removed morality from their grasp. If we could compromise in our societies and develop a plan to return sexuality to women it would be another step in reclaiming Christian strength.

Why do women feel it necessary to impose "their freedom of sexuality" on everyone throughout the Western world? I believe that they have been systematically brainwashed by the power structure to believe that their freedom comes through the removal of moral constrictions. Is it not surprising, though, that the sexual revolution coupled with the feminist movement have turned female sexuality into a sellable commodity? It is in a sense a form of prostitution. To think that women parade themselves around like peacocks in public with makeup, skimpy outfits, and disgusting tattoos is nothing less that abhorrent. Is this freedom? I think not. Rather than having restrictions imposed upon them they have simply given society a free ride, so to speak.

What should we do about this? In order to protect women from themselves we need to create a dress code. It will not be too extreme. The mantra should be "appropriateness." And indeed I should note that it should be enforced through a multi-tiered fines system. We can work together with governments to ensure that women understand the impact that their perversions have had on Western civilization.

The War In Iraq

As we slowly creep away from the absurd experiments of the 20th century and try to begin a metamorphosis into a peaceful, Christian-run world, it is becoming evident that indeed there is only one God; and He is the Christian God. One can only smirk when he hears of other "religions" which are mere sicknesses designed by the Devil to test us. The Devil is constructing his battle ever so gradually and he will hopefully one day fall back into the abyss. What is the new face of the Devil? The global power structure.

What do we make of the war in Iraq? Is it a resource grab by the Americans? Yes. On the surface. But how did they fool us so completely? Their propaganda system is getting better by the second and we should be wary of anything that the American government claims to be truth. I think there is a deeper, more covert reason for America's pillage of Iraq. It is evident that the US is constructing a state of being that mimicks the Cold War in its essence and enables Americans to pursue their "moral" war on earth. With a war running, the US can control the flow of information however they please.

Think about it. Given that the US is basically anti-Christian as we have deduced by their laws, their conduct throughout the globe, their war-mongering...I'll leave it there for now... it makes sense for them to attempt to consolidate the so-called "non-Christians" into a power block that can give merit to the bizarre simulation of Christianity that Americans practice. By doing so, the US government has designed a condition on earth that gives the appearance of upheaval when it is actually controlled very carefully. With the Cold War the US risked everything, but now that we are out of the most dangerous period in human history is is necessary for another stand-off to exist that does not pose the same risk. The War on Terror is just that. It puts a group of people into a category that enables the US to fight them without any real threat existing. Terrorism is not a threat to the US in the major sense of the word. Yes, a couple of big buildings fell down, but compared to what's happening in Iraq it was a pittance.

That is where we see the appearance of a global conflict without there actually being one. How is this serving the US goal of destroying traditional Christianity? If the US claims to possess moral superiority throughout the world, it can defeat the other religions and put into place a governing body that claims to be Christian without actually pursuing the teachings of the Bible. Quite clever, actually. What will we and up with? A disgusting blob that is Christian in name only. It will give credibility to the Americans in the Quest for global hegemony. That is all.

The war in Iraq is the first step in re-establishing the new Cold War. If the US can draw out all of its enemies and attract them to a cause that essentially opposes the world power structure, it will be easier to eliminate them using lasers in space. That is another topic to touch on at a later date.

God Bless you.

Can Any American Claim to be Pro-Life?

The United States is a nation of dichotomy, duplicity, hypocracy, and confusion. So are all great nation states. The interesting thing about the US is that it possesses, behind the walls of might, an interesting undertone of Christian faith. Sadly, however, the form of Christianity to which Americans adhere (in all walks of life and in all denominations) serves no other purpose than to advance the military power of the nation and undo the works of Christians throughout the centuries.

Let me explain. The political powers in the United States have been slowly perfecting a system of governance in which the masses are managed in accordance with an overarching plan to develop a neo-fascist state. The question is: How does a government or power structure, which includes corporations, political figures, and other brokering factors, convince a population to think they are free to make decisions when in fact the opposite is true?

George W. Bush claims to be an evangelical Christian which implies that he follows the Holy Scriptures and lives life according to the moral codes that have been provided for him. I would not go so far to say that any powerful politician could begin to claim that he could conceivably follow a moral standard (therein lie the horrors of the Western nations), but if Bush is making even a vague attempt to follow the religious doctrines of Christianity, we are all doomed. So what does it mean? Bush was elected, apparently, by a strong base of voters who claim to be Christians. The "Christian right" is what this group is being lauded as. This group elected Bush because of the hope that he would make great strides in disintegrating the wall between church and state; or perhaps they felt that he would cleanse the nation; or that he would protect them from terrorists...? I firmly believe that the US should pursue a more theocratic form of governance, but not by lying to the public.

And now we must ask another question: what does George W. Bush stand for? Global division? Evil wars that reak of resource gathering - not freedom? Isolationism? Terrorism? Guns? Racial inequality? Incompetance? If George Bush stands for Christianity, he has failed miserably and should be impeached. I suspect that he does not stand for Christianity, but instead wishes for a nation that desires death and destruction.

And the US, I might add, is by no means safer today than it was in 2001. Despite the rhetoric, the Bush goverment has done more to attract terror to the US (in addition to incompetently managing security issues) by having a lackluster approach to geo-political issues and foreign relations. The US role in Iraq has become nothing more than another excuse for Islamic extremism throughout the world. Islamic youths who once felt alienated in the West have now fallen out of the society completely and are seeking another form of salvation. What is next? An attack on Iran? On Syria? Perhaps Saudi Arabia - they have the largest oil resources in the world. If only America had an excuse to attack an ally...

So, if Bush does not stand for Christianity as he claims (remembering that if his claims are taken at face value he is a complete failure), what does he stand for? I made a few suggestions. What do my readers think?

My thesis, then, is that George W. Bush's administration completely fooled the Christian voters. He convinced them either that he would do God's work in the office, or that what they wanted was what God wanted. There is a difference between the two, albeit a subtle one.

Much like the British Empire over a century ago, America has fallen into the same imperialist traps. There is a feeling of teleological superiority in the US, however, that far exceeds anything that the British felt at the peak of their empire. The funny thing is, the British likely knew what the word "teleology" meant. Therein lies the problem with the US - an over-confident, under-educated, self-absorbed populace. Through their ignorance (which I of course apply to the masses, not the elite), the people have managed to allow the development of a nation state that works towards an end that has nothing to do with the people. How does a population have a democratically elected government that ignores the fundamental principles of democracy? A "government for the people, by the people"...not likely.

My question, then, "Can any American claim to be Pro-Life" has a succinct answer: NO. Even the holiest citizen in the US is still a participant in the processes that allow their government to trapse all over the world shrouded in secrecy and advance no cause but its own. The Christian right has served a purpose - but not one that they know about.

Now, before all the Americans who read this start leaving comments:
PLEASE READ THE ENTIRE PIECE. If find that people scan a few paragraphs and comment on small particulars. Extremely silly. Please read the piece completely and if you wish to agree or disagree, do it in an intelligent manner. Thank you and God Bless.

Merry CHRISTmas.

Moving On

It feels like a thousand years since the day I lost my true love. She was so beautiful.
I must move on.

I take some comfort in knowing that she has joined the other soldiers of heaven and will be doing a different sort of work for God. The sacrifices that she made in the name of our Lord will ultimately mean a more holy placement for her. Thank the Lord.

I have come to several conclusions about my wife's death:
Social welfare states were constructed most recently after WWII to ensure that populations were protected from the economic upheaval that would inevitably result from the massive reconstruction effort. The time has long passed, however, and the continued existence of these socialist pockets in the Western world are an abhorration to Man and are undermining the capitalist spirit. Governments are essentially stealing our hard-earned money, redistributing it by means of healthcare, education, and so-called "infrastructure development," and doing it all so inefficiently that it counteracts the overall intent. It is bizarre to think that we have elected or appointed a power structure that consistently acts without the people in mind and accentuates the inequalities that are inherent in our society. Should governments not adhere to the laws that they and their predecessors constructed and ensure equality under the law and ONLY UNDER THE LAW?

If my wife and I had not been forced to transfer 40% of our earned wealth to the government so that it could provide us with incompetant and poorly delivered healthcare, there is the likelyhood that she would not have passed away. I could have been purchasing the best healthcare available for her. Instead she spent months waiting for scans and tests. And then she died.

Why is it that we fear so much for the weak and impoverished that we all suffer? Indeed, we should care for them, but not make them a priority over the majority. It is a grand conspiracy to keep the middle class absent from the decision-making process within democracies. By removing their wealth and having it trickle downwards to the poor, and additionally upwards to the rich, governments have created a class that has never been seen in the history of Man - a middle class with no real political power, money, or resources; that lives upon a precipice awaiting a catastrophe such as war or economic stagnation. No matter who we vote for, the governments have nothing in mind except the preservation of the status quo and keeping the potential might of the educated middle class at bay.

We all know who is behind the scheme and yet it is against the law to speak of it. What can we do about it? Historical processes have forced us to pity them even though they have sustained prominance in the Western world and ultimately reinserted themselves into the Holy Land. How is it that we have allowed a people to so callously manipulate the governance of so-called independent nation states through trickery, false evidence, and dominion over economic functionality? It must be stopped somehow.

My wife is dead. As am I. God will make His choices wisely as is His way. Until then, however, I will continue the fight for Christianity and use every means necessary to educate my readers. They must learn the truth about the world and how it really works under the hand of God. Thank you and God Bless.

Untitled

I suppose it seems silly that this is my solace.

My wife's funeral is on Monday morning. My family is with me.

I was married to Anna for 37 years. We met when we were both 21. We married a year later.

My life has been nothing but perfect. She was the love of my life and I will miss her.

About nine months ago she woke up in the morning and yelled for me. She couldn't move her lower body. I called an ambulance and they rushed her to the hospital. It turned out to be cancer - she had a tumor next to her spinal cord. She suffered, but never complained.

I expected her death to come. And now I can't bear it.

Thank you all for your wishes of hope and your prayers.

I may be absent from my blog for awhile. I will try to surf when I have time. Perhaps a battle or two.

Goodnight all. God Bless you.

God's Work

My wife passed away this evening. I don't know what to say. She was ill for the past two years and I spent the majority of my spare time with her - talking with her, helping her deal with her fears, preparing.

It is hard for those of us with faith to face death. On the one hand, we look forward to the afterlife and heaven. There is always the fear, however, that we did not meet God's requirements. My wife was a good person - she looked after me and helped me serve our Lord. I will miss her.

I don't know why God sent my wife away before me. I wish I had gone first - I wish I could go now. I will continue to serve the Lord. But I miss Anna. Goodnight. Please pray for us.



























God Bless